People used to think that the world was flat, the earth was
the center of the universe, planets were pushed around their orbits by angels,
and objects fell to the earth because of their desire for the “cosmic center.”
At first, ideas about gravity, friction, and laws of motion were crazy and
unbelievable. Is this not the same situation presented here today concerning
classical physics versus quantum mechanics? John Bell believed that quantum mechanics “reveals the incompleteness
of our worldview.” His concern with quantum mechanics “is not that an error
will be found in any of its predictions, but that it is not the whole story.”
Classic mechanics explains how a physical object will act or
react in a given situation (think back to when you learned about gravity and friction).
Classical mechanics shows us a deterministic worldview – it shows that any
object is created with a specific instruction set on how it must act and, on
its most basic level, we can calculate what will happen in any given situation
with a formula. Classical physics only deals with matter, you know there is a
mind, but prefer to keep the two separate.
Experimental demonstrations of quantum theory, however,
forces physics to acknowledge both the mind and the matter. Quantum mechanics
is the theory that atoms do not act solely as waves or solely as particles, but
rather, a combination of both. Essentially, this means that an atom can either
be everywhere or nowhere – we only see the atom when we actively observe it.
Even classical physicists are forced to accept quantum
mechanics on some level. In order to work with the benefits of quantum
mechanics many adopted the Copenhagen Theory on quantum mechanics. This theory explains
out much of the weirdness and allows physicists to use quantum mechanics without
thinking about what the implications of quantum mechanics really are. It
basically says that it is okay to treat the microscopic realm differently than
the macroscopic realm. But why should they be treated differently? A water molecule is a water molecule
because of the atoms that combine to create it, so why would the individual
atoms and the collection of atoms be treated differently?
Einstein labeled quantum mechanics as “spooky.” One third of
our economy today depends on products based off of the predictions of the
quantum theory, but the implications of this theory (not the practical uses)
are what Einstein and many modern scientists today cannot believe. Basically,
the quantum theory at its core states that an atom is everywhere – or nowhere –
until it is observed. Since everything is made up of atoms, like a chair, this
would mean that a chair isn’t there unless it is being observed. The more
interesting part of this theory is what defines being “observed.” One
explanation of who’s or what’s observation counts to make the chair exist is
called entanglement. Basically, it says that everything in the universe is entangled
with other things in some way (a form of observation) – which makes it possible
for the chair to always seem to exist.
Einstein and several other great
scientists went out to prove one day that the quantum theory is wrong. Instead,
their experiment not only showed them that the theory was correct, but the
atoms seem to have instantaneous communication as well. This is even spookier
because it means that somehow the atoms are able to influence each other by
means faster than the speed of light – something that scientists have said is
not possible. Entanglement once again would explain this instantaneous
communication because everything is interconnected. Although quantum theory is
still very much a mystery, the idea of entanglement and that somehow the whole
universe works together almost as a force of its own seems to be very similar
to eastern religion philosophy that the Ultimate Reality is more of a force or
an “it” – not a “he” or God that rules over everything.
These articles seem to prove that entanglement theory may be
possible… Makes you think!
The universe has been around for 15 billion years, while
human history has been around for merely 5,000 years. What is interesting about
this is that if the universe has been around for so long without humans why do
some religions insist that there is a human specific God. I believe that the
universe is run by something, some force, which is more encompassing of time
and everything in the universe – not just encompassing of the humans and their
short time on earth. I feel that every person has a right to their own religion
– why do some people think then that only one religion is the “right” one? Why
can’t some force or energy that has been present in the universe for billions
of years be the all-encompassing answer?
We are in an age where science is our predominant worldview
– and many people depend on science and nothing else to explain why things
happen a certain way. Just think back to the beginnings of religion – something
more of an animistic type of religion. They would see something fall to the
earth and explain that spirits caused the thing to fall to the earth. In the
modern world, many today would say that it wasn’t spirits, but gravity that
caused the thing to fall to the earth. The even more modern and groundbreaking
idea is that Einstein’s theory of relativity is not enough to explain the
intricacies of how gravity works and that perhaps there is something more to
it, something more to do with quantum mechanics, something called the quantum
theory of gravity. Science is ever changing and as we learn more and more. We
once thought the world was flat. Who is to say that the modern day theories of
how life works and how the world is will stand up to the test of time and further
research and studies??
The Hindu view of the Ultimate Reality is Brahman – or a
sort of ultimate force or power that permeates everything. Although many of the
Hindu religion choose their own personal deity (such as Vishnu or Shiva) to help
them relate to Brahman, the main philosophy of Brahman is similar to ideas put
forth in quantum theory. For the world to remain in balance it is important to
believe that all humans, animals, and nature are all of the same stuff and are
all interconnected. Not only is this important in religion, it is important in
the way we live – as shown through basic scientific, epidemiologic, and
ecologic principles. You could say that you are the Ultimate Reality, as long
as you did so with the understanding that you are not the ultimate reality as
in a god, but as a small essential piece of the whole.
The Secret by Rhonda Byrne tells us how to use positive
energy to tell the universe what you want.
Click HERE for more information.
A small essential piece of the whole. Every tiny atom in the
universe has energy that contributes to the flow of energy all over the world.
The key is learning how to focus that energy to achieve your own goals. How do
you do it? I believe it is all in the mind. It is by sparking a reaction in the
universe by your free will choice to achieve something you want (recall that
this would be a form of observation in the entanglement theory). Whatever you
want can be great or small.
Talking with Horses by Henry Blake is a great introduction
on the basics of horse communication using your body energy. Click HERE for more information.
My favorite little experiment I test to see if it is the
cues and actions that prompt the horse or the energy that you use to do so, is
to work with a new horse person. When I have a horse loose in an arena, I can
ask it to walk, trot, canter, turn, or stop based on the position of my body
and the amount of energy I “push” towards the horse (When horses are really
responsive, I can do this by barely moving at all. Sometimes, however, I do
need to use my arm as a pointer or a whip). I often teach new horse people this
technique in lessons to get a horse to respect and listen to them. Using the
same horse, the lesson student will try to do the same thing I just did. This
time, however, even with the use of a whip, the student has trouble even
getting the horse to move forward and I will find them right next to the horse,
tapping it with the whip with no response. Why can I stand in the middle of the
arena and have the horse move around me and why can the student get right next
to the horse with no response? It is all about the energy! The student’s energy
is unsure, maybe even a little timid. Therefore, the horse feels no need to
listen to them.
Horse trainer, Klaus Ferdinand Hempfling, is a master of using body language and energy to work with horses. Watch how closely the horse mimics each movement he makes on the ground.
My own example of riding a horse using body language and proper energy. Watch at the end of the video how interested and happy the horse seems to be with me.
Your mind is really a powerful tool. Think about how you
want to direct your energy – whether it is on something small like focusing on
asking a horse to move, or on something big like landing that new job by thinking
positively. I admit, this does seem really far-fetched. I find it interesting,
however, that similar theories have been present in religions as old as
Hinduism and in groundbreaking scientific theories as new as quantum mechanics.
What I know for sure is that the world and the universe it is a part of is a
very strange place and we are not even close to discovering half of its
mysteries.
No comments:
Post a Comment